“It’s a myth that there is not a sufficient pool of
women available to serve on South African boards,” said Prof Anita Bosch,
Research Chair: Women at Work at the University of Stellenbosch Business School
(USB).
“As of July this year, South Africa has over
17 000 female SAICA (South African Institute for Chartered Accountants)
affiliated chartered accountants. In 2010 there were 24 000 females
graduating with Masters Degrees, and 6 100 with PhDs. These figures have
increased in 2017 to roughly 31 000 women with Masters Degrees and 10 000
with PhDs.
“Over the period of 2010 to 2017 there has been
consistently more women candidate attorneys registered than men. There are also
a vast number of associate professors and professors. So it is not about not
enough women available to serve on boards.”
Bosch
was speaking at The USB Business Breakfast is an annual event held in
Johannesburg and Cape Town where USB academics and guest speakers engage with
industry on insights from the latest research and business practices on
governance mechanisms that drive socially sustainable solutions.
She said another myth is that all women support
targets. “That is not so. A lot of women want to resist this notion because
they don’t want to be seen as a token appointment,” she said.
“The next myth is that when targets are set, they are
met,” said Bosch. “Though quotas have worked in many parts of the world, we
have a system and target setting in South Africa but it is not met. It is
unconstitutional in South Africa to set quotas. You can set numerical targets
and with that there is a level of flexibility involved with the targets.
“Another myth is that if we leave things as they are,
there will be a natural increase in the numbers of women on boards. The number
of women on boards in South Africa on JSE-listed companies has been driven by
legislation, of which the broad-based
black economic empowerment (BEE) has been one of the biggest drivers,” she
said.
Bosch added that there is no legislation in South
Africa directly obliging companies to include women on their
boards of directors.
“However, there are several indirect legal measures
to incentivise gender diversity on boards. The King
IV Report for Corporate Governance, which is applicable on a
voluntary basis, works on this idea of ‘apply and explain’.
“The Report recommends that the governing body
should promote diversity for better decision-making and better governance. That
includes gender diversity and it should set targets for race and gender
representation,” she explained.
“Our government has various commitments. We as a
country have signed various international labour organisation conventions. We
have also signed several protocols and this is very important because we are
now held accountable against these.
“Yet, we are not meeting the requirements. Why?
Because we work in the networks that we know. We don’t deliberately broaden our
network and meet other people to collaborate with.
“We also had the failed Women Empowerment and
Gender Equality Bill, which to date has not had traction again. When you look
at annual reports of companies, gender equality on boards is not really a
primary concern. It is not one of the top issues that we are looking at,” she
said.
No comments
Post a Comment